|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
This site does not belong to the McCanns it belongs to Pamalam,
if you wish to contact the McCanns direct, please do
not
use the contact/email details on the left, use
campaign@findmadeleine.com
Site
Policy |
|
P.J.TRANSLATIONS
INDEX |
|
TRANSLATION BY INES |
|
HOLIDAY
MAKER / WITNESSES |
|
 |
|
Photo from mumbles |
|
 |
|
|
|
1606 to 1610 Witness
testimony of
Martin Smith taken
2007/05/26 with map of
sighting |
|
06 Processo 06 pages 1606 to 1610 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1606 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1607 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1608 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1609 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1610 |
 |
Date of Diligence: 2007.05.06
Location: DIC Portimao
Name: MARTIN SMITH
The witness states:
' That he comes to the process as a witness.
' Being of Irish nationality, he does not
understand Portuguese in its written or oral
form and is accompanied by an interpreter.
' That he has an apartment in Luz, Lagos,
located in the Estela da Luz Urbanizaco, A1C.
This apartment is co-owned by a friend whose
name is Li** ON****. He normally visits Portugal
three times a year. When here, he stays in the
apartment. Concerning this period, he states
that he arrived in Portugal on the 30th of
April, 2007, with a booked return date of May 9,
2007. He arrived at Faro airport and flew out
from Dublin.
' Concerning the facts under investigation, on
the 3rd of May, he went with his family to the
Dolphin restaurant in Praia da
Luz where they dined. Around 21H00 they left the
restaurant and headed toward 'Kelly's Bar';
about a 50 metre distance from the restaurant,
following the path, as it is very short. The
walk took him a few minutes. In 'Kelly's Bar' they consumed some
drinks. They left that establishment around
21H55 as his son was due to return home very
early the next day. This bar is located on Calheta Street.
' After leaving the bar, he travelled in the
opposite direction and reached a set of stairs
which gave access to Rua 25 de Abril (25th of
April Street). On this artery they followed a
second street, parallel to Rua 1 de Maio (1st of
May Street) whose name he does not remember. He
was heading toward his apartment (Estrela da Luz
complex) which is located a little above the
street that crosses the primary school. As he
reached this artery, he crossed an individual
holding a child. He notes that it is normal to
see people carrying children, especially during
the holiday season. This individual was walking
the downward path, in the opposite direction. He
is not aware where this person was headed. He
only saw him as they passed each other. He
assumed it was a father and daughter and thought
nothing more of it.
' Urged, states that when he passed this
individual, it must have been around 22H00. He
did not know at the time that a child had
disappeared. He only became aware of the
disappearance of the child the next morning,
from his daughter in Ireland. She had sent him a
message or called him regarding what had
happened. At this point he thought that
MADELEINE could have been the child he saw with
the individual.
' Regarding the individual he states that: he
was Caucasian, around 175 to 180m in height. He
appeared to be about 35/40 years old. He had a
normal complexion, a bit on the thin side. His
hair was short, in a basic male cut, brown in
colour. He cannot state if it was dark or
lighter in tone. He did not use glasses and had
no beard or moustache. He did not notice any
other relevant details partly due to the fact
that the lighting was not very good.
' He was wearing cream or beige-coloured cloth
trousers in a classic cut. He did not see his
shoes and cannot describe the colour or form of
the same.
' He states that the child was female, about
four years of age as she was similar to his
granddaughter of the same age. It was a child of
normal complexion, about a metre in height. The
child has blonde medium-hued hair, without being
very light. Her skin was very white, typical of
a Brit. He did not look at her eyes. As she was
asleep and her eyelids were closed.
' She was wearing light-coloured pyjamas. He
cannot state with certainty the colour. She was
not covered by any other cover or sheet. He
cannot confirm whether she was barefoot but in
his group, they spoke about the child having no
cover on her feet.
' Urged, he states that the individual did not
appear to be a tourist. He cannot explain this
further. It was simply his perception given the individual's clothing. He states that the
individual carried the child in his arms, with
her head laying on the individual's shoulders to
the right of the deponent. He adds that he did
not hold the child in a comfortable position.
' Having already seen various photographs of
MADELEINE alongside her images on television,
states that she may have been the child he saw.
He cannot state this as fact but is convinced
that it could have been MADELEINE. Indeed, this
is the opinion of his family.
' Questioned, says that the individual did not
speak nor did the child as she was in a deep
sleep.
' States that it is not possible to recognise
the individual in person or by photograph.
' Adds that in May and August of 2006, he saw
ROBERT MURAT in Praia da Luz bars. On one of
these occasions, he was inebriated and spoke to
everyone. He did not use glasses at this time.
He also states that the individual who carried
the child was not ROBERT. He would have
recognised him immediately.
' At being asked, states that he was accompanied
by his wife, MARY SMITH and his son, PETER
SMITH, his daughter-in-law, SIRE, and his
grandchildren of 13 and 6 years of age (children
of PE***) TA*** and CO**, his daughter AOIFE (12
years of age) and his other two grandchildren
(AI****** (10 years old) and EI**** (four years
old). These are children of his daughter B*****
who was in Ireland.
' States also that when he passed this
individual mid-street, traffic is minimal or
non-existent.
' He adds that the group passed him some metres
away so that they could make out the individual
from various distinct positions.
' He has added a sketch indicating the direction
of the locale and the sighting.
' He has no other elements to offer the
investigation.
' And nothing more was said. He reads and finds
it in conformity, ratifies and signs together
with the interpreter. |
|
1611 to 1614 Witness
testimony of
Aoife
Smith
taken 2007/05/26 |
|
6-Processos, Volume
VI, pgs. 1611 to 1614 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1611 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1612 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1613 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1614 |
 |
Date of Diligence:
2007.05.26
Location: This
Department
Name: Aoife Smith
The witness states:
' That she comes to
the process as a
witness.
' Being of Irish
nationality, she
does not understand
Portuguese in its
written or oral form
and is accompanied
by an interpreter.
' States that she
arrived on her
Portugal holiday on
the 30th of April,
2007. She came with
her parents Martin
and Mary Smith and
her two nieces.
' They stayed in the
Estrela Da Luz
complex in Praia da
Luz where her
parents have an
apartment.
' Her brother Peter
was already in the
apartment when they
arrived as was her
sister-in-law, her
nephew (six years
old), CO** and the
son of her
sister-in-law, TA***
(13 years old).
' They came with the
intention of
holidaying for about
10 days. The return
passage was booked
for May 9, 2007. She
is not exactly sure
of the date.
' Her holidays were
spent in the complex
pool, in Praia da
Luz and in the
central commercial
district. Normally,
however, they spent
a lot of time in Luz
villa.
' When dining in the
apartment, it was
normal for them not
to venture out. When
they did go to the
restaurant, they
would stop by
Kelly's Bar,
situated on Calheta
Street.
' Regarding the 3rd
of May, 2007, she
went, together with
the family, to eat
at the
Dolphin
restaurant, which is
close to
Kelly's
Bar.
When they left
the restaurant
around 21H30, they
headed toward Kelly's Bar. They
stayed there for
about 30 minutes.
' Around 22H00, they
left
Kelly's Bar.
The group headed, on
foot, for their
apartment.
' Questioned, she
responds that she
knows the time
because her brother
and father decided
to leave early that
night. There were
two reasons for
this: her
sister-in-law was
not feeling very
well and the other
reason had to do
with her brother,
sister-in-law,
nephew and son of
her sister-in-law,
who were catching a
flight to Ireland
the very next day.
' Upon leaving the
bar, they turned
right and headed
along the road for
40/50 metres. At
this point, they
again turned to the
right and ascended a
small street that
gives way to stairs.
These stairs give
access to Rua 25 de
Abril. As it was a
large group (four
adults and five
children) they
travelled apart from
each other along the
street with one
closer to the front
and the others
behind. She does not
remember how they
were separated.
' The deponent
remembers that upon
reaching the top of
the stairs, she
looked to her left
and saw a man (1)
with a child (2) in
his arms, walking
along the path Rua
25 de Abril. He was
walking in their
direction at a
distance of, give or
take, two metres.
' The deponent
crossed to the other
side of Rua 25 de
Abril and began
walking on the
street that leads to
the primary school,
in the direction of
their apartment
complex.
' She did not see if
the referenced
individual with the
child descended the
street via the
stairs or if he
continued via the 25
of Abril street.
' It was the first
time she saw that
man. She does not
remember seeing him
at any time in that
location.
' She has seen
photographs of
Madeleine McCann and
thinks that it could
have been her. She
is about 60%
certain.
' The below
referenced
description about
the individual was
taken around 22H00,
when the lighting
was weak.
' Questioned, states
that she would
probably not be able
to recognise the
individual or the
child:
Description:
' (1) the individual
was male, Caucasian,
light-skinned,
between 20/30 years
of age, of normal
complexion, normal
physique, around
180/175 metres in
height. At the time
she saw him, she did
see his face but now
cannot remember any
detail. She believes
that he had a
clean-shaven face.
She does not
remember any
tattoos, scars or
earrings. She did
not look at his
ears. His hair was
thick-ish, light
brown in colour, cut
in a short style,
short from behind
(normal) and a bit
longer on the top.
' His trousers were
beige in colour,
made of cotton,
possibly with
buttons, and without
any other
decoration.
' She did not see
what he was wearing
above his trousers
as the child covered
him completely from
the top.
' She did not notice
what shoes he was
wearing.
' The individual's
gait was normal. He
did not look tired
and walked normally
while carrying the
child.
' (2) the child was
female . She had
straight long hair
to the neck. The
colour was
light/light brown.
' She is certain
that the child was
about four years old
because her niece
(who was in the
group) is of the
same age and same
height.
' She did not see
the child's face
because she was
lying against the
individual's left
shoulder in a
vertical position
against the
individual. She
appeared to be
sleeping. Her arms
were suspended along
her body and were
not around the
individual's neck.
She did not look at
the child's hands
and cannot state the
colour of her skin.
She believes she was
white.
' There was nothing
covering the child,
a comforter/blanket
or any other piece
of clothing but she
only saw her back.
' She was wearing
light trousers,
white or
rose-coloured that
may have been
pyjamas. She does
not remember if they
were patterned as it
was dark. The
material was light
and could have been
cotton.
' She also had a
light top, with long
sleeves. She did not
see well because the
individual had his
arms around the
child. She is not
sure if the child's
top was the same
colour as her
trousers but the
trousers were light.
' Questioned
regarding her shoes,
she responds that
she did not remember
seeing any but
cannot remember if
the child had any or
not.
' Urged, affirms
that she has
finished declaring
the truth, according
to her knowledge.
' And nothing more
was said. Reads and
finds it
inconformity,
ratifies and signs
together with her
interpreter.
|
|
1615 to 1624
Witness Testimony of Peter
Daniel Smith taken
2007/05/26 with map of
sighting |
|
6-Processos, Volume VI, pgs. 1615
to1624 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1615 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1616 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1617 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1618 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1619 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1620 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1621 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1622 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1623 |
 |
|
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1624 |
 |
Date of Diligence: 2007.05.26
Location: DIC Portimao
Name: PETER DANIEL SMITH
The witness states:
' That he comes to the process as a
witness.
' Being of Irish nationality, he
does not understand Portuguese in
its written or oral form and is
accompanied by an interpreter.
' States that his father owns an
apartment in the Luz Villa, Lagos,
in Estrela da Luz, corresponding to
A1C. His father comes to Portugal at
least three times per year. This was
the deponent's first time to
Portugal.
' In that which concerns the period
in question, states that he arrived
in Portugal on the 26th of April of
2007 and had his return passage
booked for the 4th of May of the
same year. He arrived at Faro
airport via Dublin. This he arrived
a few days before his father. He was
accompanied by his wife, S***, and
his two children TA*** and CO**.
' He would like to clarify that on
the 3rd of May, he and the family
went to the
Dolphin restaurant,
situated in Praia da Luz, where they
dined. Around 12H00, they left the
restaurant and headed toward Kelly's
Bar which as about one minute away
via foot. In
Kelly's Bar
(he does
not remember the name of the street
it is on) they had a few drinks and
left there around 21H50/22H00.
' They left the bar, and went up a
set of stairs that give access to a
road just above. On this road, they
walked towards another street (whose
name he does not know) and headed
for home. At the very start of their
journey on this road, the saw an
individual holding a child. This
individual was walking normally
although, in quick steps as he was
coming down the street. It appeared
to him normal, as if this was father
and daughter. He adds that this
individual was coming down the
street, contrary to the direction of
the deponent and his family. He does
not know the destination the
individual took as he only saw him
while crossing the street.
' Urged, states that when he passed
this individual it was around
21H55/22H00 and did not know at the
time that a child had disappeared.
He only found out about the child
the next morning from someone he
knew in his complex who was also
leaving to go home. The deponent
went to the airport as he had booked
a flight to return home on this day.
' At this time, he did not associate
the individual with the
disappearance. Only after did he
connect the coincidence of the time.
From this he supposed that it could
have been MADELEINE who was with
this individual.
' The description of this individual
is as follows: Caucasian, around 175
to 180 metres. He was around 35, or
older. He was somewhat tanned as a
result of sun exposure. He had a
normal complexion, in good form. He
had short hair, brown in colour. He
does not remember if he used
glasses, a beard of a moustache. He
did not notice any other relevant
details as the lighting was bad.
' He also does not remember the
clothing the individual wore or his
shoes. He states that he did not
look at this detail as his pregnant
wife was somewhat ill and he was
constantly looking at her to make
sure she was okay.
' He states the child was female.
She was perhaps two or three years
old. She appeared to be a bit
smaller than his niece. It was a
child with a normal complexion. She
had blonde hair, medium in length,
not very light. Her skin was white,
typically British. He did not look
at her eyes as she was asleep and
her eyelids were closed.
' He does not remember her clothing
very well but believes it was light
summer clothin5 light in colour. He
does not remember is she was covered
in a blanket. He cannot affirm
whether she was barefoot.
' Having already seen various
photographs of MADELEINE alongside
her images on television, states
that she may have been the child he
saw. He cannot state this as fact
but is convinced that it could have
been MADELEINE. Indeed, this is the
opinion of his family.
' Questioned, states that the
individual did not speak nor did the
child as she was sleeping deeply. He
adds that the individual did not try
to hide his face or to look
downwards. He did not notice
anything strange.
' States that it would not be
possible to recognize the individual
in person or via photograph.
' At being asked, says that when he
saw the individual, the deponent was
accompanied by his wife, S***, his
father MARTIN, his mother MARY, his
children TA*** and CO**, his sister AOIFE and his two nieces AI******
and EI****, children of his sister.
' States also that when he passed
the individual, the individual was
descending to his right, and went
around the deponent in the middle of
the street. At that time the traffic
was minimal or non-existent..
' He adds that the group was
separated by some meters so that
they were able to see the individual
from various distinct positions.
' He has added a sketch indicating
his locale and the sighting.
' Adds also that his son TA*** was
questioned in Ireland and told that
the individual was wearing a
long-sleeved coat, back in colour,
and that the child was barefoot.
' He has no other elements to offer
the investigation.
' And nothing more was said. Reads
and finds it in conformity, ratifies
and signs together with her
interpreter.
|
|
6-Processo 6 Pages 1619 to 1624 |
|
MAP
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1619 |
|
 |
|
SMITH SIGHTING 1 - 06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1620 |
|
 |
|
SMITH SIGHTING
2
-
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1621 |
|
 |
|
SMITH SIGHTING 3
-
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1622 |
|
 |
|
SMITH SIGHTING 4 -
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1623 |
|
 |
|
SMITH SIGHTING 5 CLICK TO ENLARGE
-
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1624 |
|
 |
|
|
PROCESSO 06 |
|
|
|
2871 to 2875
Smith Family Memorandum regarding contact with PJ after
McCanns return home |
|
|
|
PROCESSO 11 |
|
|
|
3991 Martin Smith information
regarding Gerry McCann on television
2007.11.08 |
|
13-Processo Vol XIII
Page 3991 |
|
13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3991 |
 |
NUIP 201/07 o GALGS
4' Brigada
Information
We can infer, from
the analysis of the
information
contained in folios
2871 and 2872, that
the statement of
Martin Smith, duly
identified and filed
as folio 1606,
reports new
elements.
This information
alleges that upon
catching sight of
Gerald McCann on the
television news,
when he (GM) arrived
at the UK and still
at the airport, he
(GM) appeared to him
to be the individual
whom he saw on 3rd
May in Praia da Luz,
carrying a child.
As a result of this
and because of the
fact of the witness
being resident in
Ireland, we
contacted an officer
from the Irish force
for the Iberian
Peninsula, in
Madrid, Bernard
Gattney, who took on
the task of carrying
out the necessary
arrangements in
order to proceed to
a new questioning of
Martin Smith.
He was sent by email
a copy of the
information
including the
witness statement,
and a list of
questions to ask
him, duly translated
into English.
Portimao, 8th
November 2007
Inspector
Joao Carlos
|
|
|
|
3992 Email regarding Smith statement
2007.11.07
3993 to 3994
Portuguese translation of email from
Prior re: Smith statement 2007.09.20 |
|
13-Processos Vol XIII Page 3992 (in
English) |
|
13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3992 |
 |
|
13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3993 |
 |
|
13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3994 |
 |
Email sent from Joao Carlos Silva
Pereira to Bernard Gattney
8th November 2007
Subject: Martin Smith
Bernard ,
According to our phone contact, I
hereby enclose the report on Martin
Smith, son of P S and C S, born in
Ireland on *****, and an Irish
citizen, passport n' *****, home
address*****.
Following the enclosed report you
are now kindly requested to ask him
the following questions:
- Does he confirm the statement he
made in Portugal on May 26th 2007'
- Can he describe in detail the
individual he saw carrying a child
on May 3rd 2007, notwithstanding the
fact that he has already made this
description in his previous
statements' Was this individual
alone'
- When and in what mass medium has
he seen the news of Gerald McCann
going down the plane stairs, and
carrying one of his children' (If
possible he should be shown the
above-mentioned pictures, as well as
asked whether he confirms or
disconfirms this man was the same
individual he saw on May 3rd 2007).
- Was it really Gerry McCann' Is he
sure of this fact'
- Does he recognise Gerald McCann
from the facial features or from the
way he was carrying the child'
- Are his family members, namely the
ones who were with him on May 3rd
2007, able to recognise the
individual' If yes, do they also
identify the individual as being
Gerald McCann' (If yes, such family
members should also be interviewed
with a view to equally answering the
above questions).
- Any other possible significant
question, whether arising from the
answers of Martin Smith to the above
questions or that is deemed as
relevant, should be equally asked.
3993 to 3994 'Portuguese translation
of email from Prior
re: Smith statement
2007.09.20
|
|
|
|
3995 to 3997
English email re: Smith sighting
sent from Stuart Prior |
|
13-Processos Vol XIII Pages 3996 '
3997 (in English) |
|
13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3995 |
 |
|
13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3996 |
 |
|
13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3997 |
 |
Email from John Hughes to DIC
Portimao, C.C. to Stuart Prior
20th September 2007
Subject: Fwd Smith family
From Lindsay Long to John Hughes
20th September 2007
Re ' Smith family
Location : Portugal Out of Force
Area
Origin: Mr Martin Smith Ireland.
Text: Reported that he had passed a
male carrying a child in Praia da
Luz the night Maddie went missing.
Went and made a statement to
Portugal police in Portimao on 26th
May and returned to UK. Is saying
that after seeing the McCanns on the
news on 9th Sept when they returned
to UK he has not slept and is
worried sick. He states he was
watching the 10 PM on BBC and saw
the McCanns getting off the plane
and coming down the steps. He states
it was like watching an action
replay of the night he saw the male
carrying the child back in Portugal.
He states the way Gerry was carrying
his twin triggered something in his
head. It was exactly the same way
and look of the male seen the night
Maddie went missing . He also
watched ITV news and Sky news and
inferred it looked like the same
person both times carrying the
children.
Is asking a member of OP task ring
him back. He was with group of 9
family and friends the night he saw
the male in Portugal. He sounded
quite worried and shaken whilst
speaking to me
Title: Info on Maddie
|
|
|
|
PROCESSO 13 |
|
|
|
4134 Cover of fax re: Dublin
correspondence (English)
4135 to 4139
Additional statement
from Martin Smith 2008.01.30 (English)
4140 Email
|
|
16-Processos, Volume XVI, pg 4134 to 439
|
|
16_VOLUMEXVIa_Page_4134 |
 |
|
16_VOLUMEXVIa_Page_4135 |
 |
|
16_VOLUMEXVIa_Page_4136 |
 |
|
16_VOLUMEXVIa_Page_4137 |
 |
|
16_VOLUMEXVIa_Page_4138 |
 |
|
16_VOLUMEXVIa_Page_4139 |
 |
|
16_VOLUMEXVIa_Page_4140 |
 |
Detective Branch
Drogheda
County Lough
Re ' Investigation into the
disappearance of Madeleine McCann
I took an additional statement from
Mr Smith as requested. His wife does
not want to make another statement.
I showed him the video clip and he
stated that it was not the clip that
alerted him but the BBC news at 10
PM on 9th September 2007.
He has been contacted by numerous
tabloid press looking for stories.
He has been contacted by Mr Brian
Kennedy who is supporting the McCann
family to take part in a photo fit
exercise. He has given no stories or
helped in any photo fits. He sent a
solicitor's letter to six papers in
relation material that was printed
that was misquoted. The Evening
Herald paid his solicitor's fees and
all papers printed an apology. His
photograph appeared in another
tabloid paper and this matter is
being pursued at the moment.
I do not believe that Martin Smith
is courting the press and my view
his is a genuine person. He is known
locally and is a very decent person.
Forwarded please
Sergeant
Liam Hogan
I hereby declare that this statement
is true to the best of my knowledge
and belief and that I make it
knowing that if it is tendered in
evidence I will be liable to
prosecution if i state in it
anything which I know to be false or
do not believe to be true.
I would like to state that the
statement I made on 26th May 2007 in
Portugal is correct. The description
of the individual that I saw on 3rd
May 2007 carrying a child is as
follows. He was average build, 5
foot 10' in height, brown hair cut
short, aged 40 years approximately.
Wearing beige trousers and darkish
top maybe a jacket or blazer. He had
a full head of hair with a tight
cut. This individual was alone. I
saw Gerard McCann (sic) going down
the plane stairs carrying one of his
children on 9th September 2007 BBC
news at 10 PM, I have been shown the
video clip by Sergeant Hogan which I
recognise. A clip I have seen before
on the Internet. In relation to the
video clips of Gerard McCann and the
person I saw on 3rd May 2007 when I
saw the BBC news at 10 PM on 9th
September 2007 something struck me
that it could have been the same
person. It was the way Gerard McCann
turned his head down which was
similar to what the individual did
on 3rd May 2007 when we met him. It
may have been the way he was
carrying the child either. I would
be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard
McCann that I met that night
carrying a child. I am basing that
on his mannerism in the way he
carried the child off the plane.
After seeing the BBC news at 10 PM,
footage on the 9th September 2007 I
contacted Leicestershire police with
this information. During that time I
spoke to all my family members who
were with me on the night of 3rd May
2007 about this and the only one who
felt the same way as me was my wife.
She had seen the video clip of
Gerard McCann walking down the
stairs of the plane earlier that
day. We did not discuss this until
some days later. This statement has
been read over to me and is correct.
|
|
|
|
DROGHEDA IND 08-08-07
Drogheda family hit out over Madeleine case clue coverage |
|
PROCESSO 16 |
|
DOLPHIN BAR PHOTOS |
|
KELLY'S BAR PHOTOS |
|
PAGE ORDER |
|
MAPS PHOTOS |
|
AMARAL'S BOOK PHOTOS |
|
PJ PHOTOS |
|
|
|
