| 
		
		 
		Fourteen-year-old Aarushi Talwar, daughter of dentist parents, was found 
		dead with her throat slit at the family's Noida residence on the 
		intervening night of May 15-16, 2008, while the body of their domestic 
		help, Hemraj, was found on the terrace the following day. The initial 
		investigation in the case carried out by the Uttar Pradesh Police led to 
		the arrest of Aarushi's father Rajesh Talwar on May 23, 2008. After 
		frenzied media reporting and public outrage, the probe was handed over 
		to the CBI and Rajesh Talwar was granted bail by the Ghaziabad court on 
		July 11, 2008.  
		
		  
		
		The CBI, after probing the murder for over two-and-a-half years, had 
		filed its closure report in the case in the Ghaziabad Special CBI court, 
		saying it had been unable to find out any evidence to prosecute the 
		Talwars. The Ghaziabad trial court, however, had rejected the CBI 
		closure report, saying there was enough prima facie material in the 
		agency's report to put the couple on trial for their alleged involvement 
		in the twin murders and had issued summons to them to face trial. The 
		magistrate took cognisance of the case and summoned the Talwars on 
		February 9, 2011.  
		
		  
		
		Rajesh and Nupur Talwar went to the Allahabad High court, which had 
		dismissed their pleas to quash the trial court summons and the 
		proceedings initiated against them. They were then constrained to 
		approach the Supreme Court of India which had on March 19 last year 
		stayed the trial against them. The Supreme Court dismissed their 
		petitions. The Talwars will now have to stand trial for the murder of 
		their daughter.  
		
		  
		
		Two features which point to the complicity of the Talwars is the 
		surgical precision causing the death of the two, as also the fact that 
		the crime scene was 'dressed up' before policemen arrived on the scene. 
		The spate of 'honour killings' by parents in and around North India 
		gives rise too to some suspicion regarding the role of the Talwar 
		couple.  
		
		  
		
		A year before the Aarushi murder, a three-year-old British girl, 
		Madeleine McCann, whose parents were also doctors, went missing when the 
		family holidayed in Portugal in 2007. The investigation appeared to 
		focus more tightly on her parents. Portuguese police came close to 
		charging parents Kate and Gerry McCann after demanding the mother's 
		diary be seized as trial evidence. Madeleine disappeared from a room in 
		a Portuguese holiday resort in May while she and her younger twin 
		siblings were left unattended when her parents were dining with seven of 
		their friends at a nearby restaurant 50 metres away.  
		
		  
		
		The Portuguese newspaper 'Correio da Manha' cited police sources as 
		saying new tests on blood found in the car hired by the McCanns 
		conclusively showed it was Madeleine's. "The definitive result of the 
		tests leaves no doubts for the Policia Judiciaria. The blood found in 
		the Mc Canns' car is that of Madeleine as well as those samples detected 
		in the flat," the paper said. Portuguese newspapers had already 
		published what they claim are extracts from Kate's journal and say the 
		diary is fundamental to the belief that the 39-year-old GP and 
		mother-of-three was involved in the death of her daughter. Passages are 
		said to reveal a mother at her wits' end coping with three hysterical 
		kids. Her twins, Sean and Amelie, were aged two when their sister 
		vanished. Cardiologist Gerry, 39, is said to be portrayed as an absentee 
		dad happy to leave his wife to shoulder the burden while he relaxed on 
		holidays.  
		
		  
		
		Unsubstantiated claims in the Portuguese media said police believed that 
		the child was killed in the apartment and her body moved in a car hired 
		25 days after she vanished. According to 'Correio Da Manha', the police 
		case against the McCanns consisted of sniffer dogs and that traces of 
		blood indicate the presence of the little girl's body behind a sofa and 
		in the trunk of the car. The McCanns, though formally notified as 
		'suspects', were allowed to leave Portugal when the English Press 
		thoroughly examined their rather shameful role in the sordid affair. The 
		parents remain free even as the child remains untraced and reports 
		recently emanated that a child resembling the missing one was seen in 
		Leh in India sometime in July, 2011. 
		
		  
		
		Seasoned investigators say that investigations alone cannot tell the 
		complete story, some lucky breakthrough is often essential to solve a 
		crime. 
		  
		
		  
		
		Investigations fall short in certain cases where the motive is 
		completely oblique. It is for this reason that the celebrated Judge Lord 
		Denning said, "The devil himself knows not the thought of man."  
		
		  
		
		In a murder case in Chikamagalur District (Mrs Gandhi's constituency) in 
		1995-96, an attractive housewife, Smt. Aruna, was found strangled to 
		death by an electric cord, in nude state. Her gold bangles were stolen 
		but much of the valuables remained locked in her almirah. The needle of 
		suspicion pointed towards her husband Dr Manjunath since their 
		three-year-old daughter told the police during interrogation that her 
		father, who had left for the clinic in the morning, had returned home 
		for a brief while. Dr Manjunath was imprisoned without bail for as much 
		as a year. Meanwhile, the trial went on. In the public eye and in the 
		eyes of the press, Dr Manjunath turned into one of the worst kind of 
		cold-blooded killers. 
		
		  
		
		  
		
		Two years later, in a stray incident, three travelling salesmen of a 
		reputed company were arrested in Goa (about 600 km away from 
		Chikamagalur) for strangling a lone woman to death. When interrogated, 
		they provided a list of killings that they had been involved in, 
		including that of Smt. Aruna. Dr Manjunath was forthwith absolved of all 
		charges since a self-inculpatory confession had been made by the 
		travelling salesmen. 
		
		  
		
		  
		
		This presents a lesson for the public who are baying for the blood of 
		either the Talwars or Krishna in the Arushi murder case or even in that 
		of Ruchika Girhotra's case. Ruchika's case is a stand-alone one, in 
		which, if the facts as projected ultimately turn out to be true, Mr SPS 
		Rathore deserves the worst kind of punishment.   
		
		  
		
		  
		
		However, the press or the public have not been invested with the powers 
		to conduct trial. It reminds one of a lady teacher who was arrested for 
		prostitution and for involving her students in the trade too. It turned 
		out to be some journalist's idea of a great story. Trial by the media or 
		by the people's court is dangerous. Civilisation has advanced far too 
		much for popular trials where due process is not followed, nor the rule 
		of law.  |