|
De
onmogelijke
ontvoering
Madeleine
Leugens en
Misleiding
Peter
Scharrenberg
Don't buy
the book.
Its
robot-produced
back is
broken
already.
It's
shedding its
pages.
The content?
Riddled with
mistakes and
made up
stuff.
Full of
misinformation
and twisted
stories.
Madeleine
disappeared
from her
little bed.
Mark
Harrison
is a dog
handler,
there's a
super
injunction
in place in
the UK to
ban all
media to
report about
any
involvement
of the
McCanns,
Kate's
wearing
flip-flops,
Murat had
been
arrested....
In between
all this the
book casts
doubt on the
parents, in
nearly every
chapter.
It also
states
there's no
proof of
their
involvement.
It purports
the theory
of Gerry
McCann being
absent from
the round
table
between
9.30 and
10.00 pm.
Thus
enabling the
thought that
a dead
Madeleine
was being
carried by
Gerry as
seen by the
Smith
family. Next
purported
step is
hidden in
the church.
Perhaps
unintentionally
helped by
father
father
Pacheco,
John
Geraghty
is
also
mentioned as
possibly
involved in
the hiding
of the body.
This
scenario
also has the
freezer
incorporated,
as those
darn bodily
fluids in
the Scenic
have to be
explained.
And of
course it's
very
critical of
the
Portuguese
Police, but
without
mentioning
the pressure
they were
under.
Strangely
absent in
the
narrative
are:
-
The
political
side, no
ambassador
mentioned.
-
No
mention
of the
unhelpful
attitude
of the
uk
police
on
requests
of the
PJ
-
No
mention
about
the
media
circus
that hit
PdL.
It's badly
written,
disgustingly
bad if I may
say so.
It doesn't
even get the
names right
while
acknowledging
sources on
the last
page.
Jeanne
Morais, Tony
Bennet.
Question is,
why was it
written. It
does suit
the McCann
agenda
perfectly
well.
It's
privately
published in
a language
not widely
understood.
It creates
more
confusion.
It harms the
integrity of
the people
that rightly
question
this case.
I wonder
who's paying
for it.
Nothing else
to say
really,
ignore it!
'drops the
last loose
page'
parapono |
