The purpose of this site is for information and a record of Gerry McCann's Blog Archives. As most people will appreciate GM deleted all past blogs from the official website. Hopefully this Archive will be helpful to anyone who is interested in Justice for Madeleine Beth McCann. Many Thanks, Pamalam

Note: This site does not belong to the McCanns. It belongs to Pamalam. If you wish to contact the McCanns directly, please use the contact/email details campaign@findmadeleine.com    

Court sittings UK Supreme Court Week commencing 20 Feb 2012. Kevin Halligen. Case details: Time estimate number of days 1.5 days

HOMEPAGE NEWS REPORTS INDEX INVESTIGATION KEVIN HALLIGEN NEWS FEBRUARY 2012
Original Source:  SUPREME COURT: MONDAY 20 FEBRUARY 2012
Week commencing 20 Feb 2012.
 

Case details  Time estimate number of days  1.5 days

General
CaseID UKSC 2011/0180
Case name R (on the application of Halligen) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
Case stage Hearing Scheduled
Date of issue 10 Aug 2011
Expedition requested Not Applied For
Order being appealed - Date 21 Jun 2011
Order being appealed - Court Divisional Court QBD (EW)
Devolution No
Human Rights raised Yes
Human Rights raised - details Article 6 ECHR Declaration of Incompatibility sought
Intervener No
Permission to appeal
Date supporting documents received 16 Aug 2011
Date PTA application referred to justices 04 Oct 2011
Date of oral hearing  
Permission granted/refused Granted
Notice of intention to proceed filed Yes
Appellant name Kevin Richard Halligen
Appellant case due date  
Appellant case date filed  
Respondent name Secretary of State for the Home Department
Date form 3 filed 18 Nov 2011
Date form 3 issued  
Respondent case due date  
Respondent case date filed 31 Jan 2012
Intervener - names
Parties
Appellant name Kevin Richard Halligen
Appellant case due date  
Appellant case date filed  
Respondent name Secretary of State for the Home Department
Date form 3 filed 18 Nov 2011
Date form 3 issued  
Respondent case due date  
Respondent case date filed 31 Jan 2012
Intervener - names
 
 
Case Summary
On appeal from the QBD Divisional Court (England and Wales)

Issues

What are the minimum requirements to constitute good notice of appeal for the purposes of section 108(4) of the Extradition Act 2003?

If an individual is notified by fax sent after 4:30p.m. that the Secretary of State has decided to order his extradition, when does time begin to run for the purposes of the 14-day time limit in section 108(4) of the Extradition Act 2003?

Facts

The Appellant was arrested under a provisional arrest warrant issued under section 73 of the Extradition Act 2003. He was remanded in custody while the Secretary of State considered whether to order his extradition to the USA. On 22 December 2010 officials acting on behalf of the Secretary of State sent a fax to the Appellant informing him that the Secretary of State had decided to order his extradition. It is not clear whether the fax was sent before or after 4:30pm on that day.

Seven days later, on 29 December 2010, the Appellant’s solicitors filed a full notice of appeal in form N161 with the Administrative Court. On the same day, the Appellant also sent a handwritten letter to the Secretary of State asking her to ‘accept this letter as notice and service of my intent to appeal that order’ and stating that he had instructed solicitors and counsel for that purpose.

On 4 January 2011 the 14-day time limit for filing and serving a notice of appeal prima facie expired. On 5 January 2011 the Appellant’s solicitors faxed a sealed copy of the Appellant’s form N161 to the Crown Prosecution Service and posted a sealed copy of the form to the Secretary of State.

On trial of a preliminary issue, the Divisional Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the Secretary of State’s decision to order the Appellant’s extradition since the Appellant had failed to comply with the requirements of section 108(4) of the Extradition Act 2003. The court held that the Appellant’s handwritten letter was not a notice of appeal because it was no more than an indication that the Appellant intended to appeal. The court also held that the 14-day time limit began to run on the day that the Appellant was informed that the Secretary of State had ordered his extradition, regardless of what time during the day the fax notifying him of the decision was actually sent. Accordingly, the time-limit for filing and serving a valid notice of appeal had expired on 4 January 2011 – before the Appellant served his form N161 on the Secretary of State and the CPS.


Subject Matter catchwords for indexing

Extradition – Appeals – Requirements of valid notice of appeal – When time begins to run for purposes of statutory 14-day time limit
Appeal
Justices allocated Yes
Justices allocated - names Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
Lady Hale of Richmond
Lord Mance of Frognal
Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore
Lord Wilson
PTA granted by court below No
Statement of facts & issues and Appendix due date 07 Feb 2012
Statement of facts & issues and Appendix date filed  
Time estimate  
Time estimate received  
Time estimate number of days 1.5 days
Hearing date 21 Feb 2012
Other hearing location  
Core volumes due date  
Core volumes date filed  
Authorities due date  
Authorities date filed  
Hand down date
 
http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk/current-cases/CCCaseDetails/case_2011_0180.html  

Court sittings UK Supreme Court Week commencing 20 Feb 2012.

21 Feb 2012  

Court 2

10:30

R (on the application of Halligen) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)

 Case ID: UKSC 2011/0180

 

 22 Feb 2012  

Court 2

10:30

R (on the application of Halligen) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)

 Case ID: UKSC 2011/0180 

http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk/visiting/sittings.html 

http://news.sky.com/home/supreme-court

TO HELP KEEP THIS SITE ON LINE CONSIDER

Site Policy Contact details Sitemap Website created by © Pamalam