Madeleine McCann's parents are to lodge a complaint with 
			Portuguese police claiming that former detective Goncalo Amaral 
			broke his country's strict judicial secrecy laws.
			
			
			
			Gerry and Kate McCann's lawyer says they will formally accuse him 
			of passing on information about the police investigation into 
			Madeleine's disappearance before the case was closed - a criminal 
			offence in Portugal.
			
			Isabel Duarte, the couple's Portuguese lawyer, says Mr Amaral 
			broke the law by sending a draft of his book to his publishers 
			several months before the judicial secrecy period in the case was 
			lifted in July 2008.
			
			She said: "It seems that Goncalo Amaral passed information in the 
			case files before the secrecy was lifted."
			
			
			Earlier, an emotional Kate McCann left court in Lisbon facing the 
			prospect of hearing allegations that she and her husband covered up 
			their daughter's death repeated in courtrooms across Europe for 
			years to come.
			
			Speaking in a low voice, Mrs McCann told waiting reporters she 
			believed in the Portuguese justice system and that bringing the 
			libel action against former policeman Mr Amaral was the right thing 
			to do.
			
			However, Mr Amaral has now declared that if he loses his bid to 
			overturn their injunction on his book, Maddie: The Truth Of The Lie, 
			he will appeal all the way through the country's courts and on to 
			the European Court of Human Rights - a process that could take 
			years.
			
			The book, which was also made into a documentary on Portuguese 
			TV, claims that
			Madeleine McCann died in the 
			holiday apartment from which she vanished in May 2007.
			
				
					
						
						  | 
					
					
						| 
						 
						
						Madeleine: missing since 2007  | 
					
				
			 
			 
			
			In it, Mr Amaral - the lead detective on the investigation into 
			the then-three-year-old's disappearance until being removed from the 
			post five months later - goes on to say that the McCanns covered up 
			the death.
			
			Mr and Mrs McCann, who have always strongly denied the claims, 
			launched a defamation case - saying they feared that if people 
			believed their daughter was dead they would stop searching for her.
			
			The past three days have seen a court in Lisbon debate whether an 
			injunction obtained by the McCanns suspending further publication of 
			the book and documentary should be allowed to stand.
			
			Mr Amaral's lawyers have called a series of witnesses who have 
			backed up the claims he made in the book, saying they believed them 
			to be based on the facts of the investigation.
			
			They have also tried to characterise the legal action as an 
			attack on the Portuguese constitution and freedom of speech, a 
			charge the McCanns deny.
			
				
					
						
						  | 
					
					
						| 
						 
						Mr 
						Amaral was taken off case  | 
					
				
			 
			
			The witnesses made many references to the hostile treatment of 
			Portuguese detectives in general and Mr Amaral in particular at the 
			hands of certain sections of the British media.
			
			During the second day of the trial it was reported by the BBC 
			that Mr Amaral had said "F*** the McCanns" -
			a claim he strongly denies, 
			saying it was a misinterpretation of his Portuguese.
			
			Ms Duarte accused Mr Amaral of trying to put the couple on trial 
			in this week's hearings.
			
			She said: "They are trying to judge in a civil court what they 
			could not judge in a criminal court."
			
			Ms Duarte said the McCanns were not surprised by the witnesses 
			called by Mr Amaral.
			
			"I am sorry my clients had to be submitted to this pain and this 
			distress," she said.
			
			"This is awful, but we knew that Pandora's Box was open. We are 
			prepared to hear what they say."
			
			A ruling in the current series of hearings, which will determine 
			whether the temporary injunction on Mr Amaral's book will stand, 
			will be made following further statements from two further witnesses 
			on February 10.
			
			However, the McCanns must then go back to court to make the ban 
			permanent at a date yet to be confirmed.
			
			They are also fighting a separate case claiming more than ?1m in 
			damages from Mr Amaral.